PR’s Public Flogging
PR Week has an article this week about a second editor who has posted a black list of PR professionals who have sent her unwelcome pitches. Gina Trapani, editor of Lifehacker, followed in the footsteps of Wired magazine editor, Chris Anderson, posting the e-mail addresses of PR people who have not met their expectations for pitching stories.
I understand reporters’ frustration. Public relations professionals have a responsibility to research a publication, formulate a pitch that is relevant to an outlet’s readers or viewers and send the pitch to the right person. However, this mass posting of PR professionals’ e-mail addresses demonstrates a severe lack of understanding of our own professional responsibilities, time constraints and the demands placed upon us.
In the rapidly changing media world, keeping up with exactly who covers what at even one, let alone the many hundreds of news outlets we must pitch, is all but impossible. Reporters move to new publications, take different positions and sometimes just leave the industry altogether. Even when you feel confident a topic falls squarely within a reporter’s coverage area, a pitch may not resonate.
PR professionals, at least good ones, make every effort to work with reporters in the way that suits each of them best. These whiny postings of blacklisted PR people serve only to degrade a relationship between reporters and PR professionals that should be mutually beneficial. And they demonstrate a severe lack of understanding of the benefits we can provide to them.
PR professionals actually serve many important purposes for reporters. We ensure that information coming out of a company is accurate. Without accurate information, a reporter’s story, and potentially their credibility, is jeopardized. Furthermore, we educate our clients about the needs and constraints of reporters. We tell clients when a story is irrelevant and steer them on a course to providing real, pertinent news.
Without PR professionals, reporters would be lucky to receive any significant story ideas in their inboxes. Believe me. I have heard what many CEOs consider to be a good story. Alternately, reporters’ access to the business leaders who provide the color and details that make a story shine would diminish. Skepticism of reporters among top-level corporate players is remarkably high and PR professionals help bridge that gap.
We are the link between reporters and the people and organizations they cover. Few companies would manage to get the needed information in reporters’ hands without us. And however irrelevant reporters may find many of our pitches, few of them would manage to do their jobs well without us.
Categories
Recent Posts
- Reaching and Connecting with the New Affluent Consumer
- Philosophy Communication takes home gold.
- Philosophy Communication Hires Marni Hale to Strengthen Home and Appliance Division and Lead Southern California Office
- In advertising big bucks don’t always equal big bang
- 5 Tips for Analyzing SEO Data
- Ebay has a new brand logo
- Design Philosophy: Bikes Belong Poster Advertisement
- Are Typos and Grammatical Errors Forgiven in the Fast-Moving Age of Social Media?
- Iconic Logos That Weren’t Always So
- Walking the Fine Line of Social Media
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007